The Statue represents an important moment in that great epic of ours, Mahabharata.The epic is about the two warring group of cousins: Pandavas and Kauravas. Yet to put it so simply is being grossly reductive. Like any great classic (think of Iliad and Odyssey) Mahabharata is not about one linear storyline and one crux. It is made up of a great array of characters and there are all their stories to contend with; besides ofcourse philosophical and religious discourses and discussions of morality. So much so that the author (or rather the compiler/anthologist of this epic), the sage Vyasa says something like, What's not in this is not found anywhere else, and if it is not found here then it is nowhere else. Such comprehensiveness!
The statue depicts a charioteer, and a warrior with his bow and arrows. The warrior Arjuna is one of the greatest heroes and archers in Indian mythology. One episode vouches for his powers of concentration and his ardent love for his craft. His guru Dronacharya asks his pupils
(Pandavas of whom Arjuna is one, and Kauravas who are a hundred in number and his led by Duryodhana) to aim at a bird perched upon a tree (I think it is a bird or it could be a fruit such as the mango) with their bows and arrows. Then he asks them one by one to describe what they are able to see. Ajuna alone says that he can't see anything else than the eye of the bird he has been aiming at. Befittingly he wins his wife Draupadi (Interestingly Draupadi is the wife of all the Pandavas-five of them in all and not just Arjuna) at an archery contest. In the epic there are only two other warriors who come close to beating Arjuna in archery. They are Karna and Ekalavya. Yet both are handicapped by others' schemings that it only serves to reduce the glory of Arjuna: It raises the classic 'If only...' questions.
The charioteer is no ordinary charioteer. He is Krishna. He is such a multifaceted personality that there are so many ways to describe him-charmer of women and one of the greatest lover in Indian mythology, cowherd, counsel for the Pandavas, philosopher, schemer of the wisest and vilest kind, charioteer, and a king in his own right..! Krishna was greatly instrumental in the victory of the Pandavas over Kauravas in the Kurukshetra war (fought somewhere near present day Delhi). Without getting overly judgemental let me just say that all that was done by Krishna to bring victory to the Pandavas wouldn't come across as being wholesome. One can put a finger on a lot of other characters in Mahabharata and finally (even though with the greatest of difficulty and vacillation) say whether the character has been good or bad. Such a judgement, in my view, is not possible to carry out on Krishna. And in a way it is only befitting. Some points of view hold that God for most parts has nothing to do with the man-made morals; that the Lord acts in mysterious ways not all of which we can be readily understand and Krishna afterall is one of the avatars (roughly incarnations) of Lord Vishnu.
Now coming back to the Statue...The Pandavas and Kauravas are all lined up as the worst of enemies. But they are cousins and hence Arjuna sees so many of his grand relations (uncles, cousins), his guru Dronacharya and so many of his acquaintances all lined up on the other side. He thinks of the lives he has to take, the bodies his arrows have to fell-they are all his relations, his dear ones. He hesitates and wonders if the success shall be worth all the dear lives he has to get past. Even though he is convinced that the Pandavas have been wronged and that Dharma (roughly translated as Justice, virtuousness, righteousness) is on their side he is now paralysed by confusion and the contemplation of immense grief and disaster. Then Krishna on the eve of the war appears in all his Godly glory and advises Arjuna, which forms the cornerstone of Indian Philosophy: The Gita, the essence of which is often paraphrased as, 'Perform your duty without expecting the results'.
In your scrap book you could probably name the statue as, 'The Sermon at the Battlefront'.
oh a nice and fairly comprehensive write up...but I would have liked more on Karna (way more interesting than Arjuna, dont u think?)...my fav. part is the one on Krishna...
ReplyDeletecant resist adding..i dont think there is an expression called "take life" isnt that a literal translation from Hindis' "jaan lena"!!!!!
heyy sab i am glad if you do excuse me for that faux pas..!
ReplyDeletepraveena i think u are right on both counts! Karna IS more interesting, esp after I have now watched the film by the same name with who else but Sivaji playing Karna!! And yes that phrase is just the tamil 'uriya vaangiduvaen..!' in english!!
maheshC.
am so happy praveena pointed that out..and am so glad u committed that mistake..i so luv it when i can find faults wid ur writting ;)
ReplyDeleteThe movie Karna has wonderful songs...and I love the scene where..Duryodhana's wife (Savitri???) and Karna are playing a game and she gets up to leave (is it bcoz she is losing?) and while playfully trying to grab her, Karna breaks some jewel shes wearing on her hip and suddenly Duryodhana comes in and they are both embarassed that he might misconstrue what happened..but he just ignores it...and picks up the gems...and joins the fun..it shows him in such a different light..everywhere else..hes only the villain..here, hes human, with friends and love...right? and Shivaji is so handsome..just like how the 'real' Karna would've looked am sure!!!
ReplyDeleteHey Praveena..
ReplyDeleteKarna is a good movie! The song in the climax 'Ullathil nalla ullam urangaadhenbadhu..' is a touching song for the tragic end.
In the scene you talked about Duryodhana kneels down and says 'Eduapadho Korpadho...' when he is about to pick up those pearls (or gems?). I mean he so casually asks whether he needs to just pick them up or even string them all together...its a telling scene for his confidence in his friend and wife...such a side to a person who looks like a complete pain!
What I am not sure is whether this facet of Duryodhana was added in the tamil recreations (Kambar's for example) of Mahabharatha or was there in the original itself. There has been a tendency in tamil cultural products to reclaim the villainous characters such as Duryodhana and Ravana and show their nobel and heroic attributes too. If I am not wrong there is a tamil film called Ravana (at any rate surely a play) which I guess retells Ramayana from Ravana's point of view.
Anyways revisionary history (and mythology)is always interesting!
Having read the Bhagvad Geeta I'm just happy to see Krishna's name on this post. Once you read the Geeta, and if you are ready to trust Krishna, you realise that Krishna is not a Vishnu Avtara, He is the Primeval Source of all universes and within each universe He expands Himself to be known as Vishnu. Krishna is Para-Bramha, He is beyond Bramha-Vishnu-Mahesh, these trinities are but His representatives in each universe He creates. Krishna not only says this Himself, but He also proves His point.
ReplyDeleteYou find mythology interesting, you should seek out The Geeta and have a fun read. The translation in english considered valid is by A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada. He comes in the line of disciplic succession and therefore presents The Geeta As It Is. Nothing is lost in translation.
enjoy your self,
vyoma.
Hey mahesh! Long time no post? I was lookin thru last years overtures presentations.. and saw u on 3.4's. Felt good to see you, even if it was a photo, so droppin in a line.
ReplyDelete:-D
Do mail in sometimes,
Rubeena.
hi mahesh...I hope you remember me..
ReplyDeleteThis is Shruti/PB from idiosyncrasy..:-P..guess I massively lost touch with you guys...How are you doing? :)
http://idiosyncrasy.rediffblogs.com
Hi This is saba here. I came here through http://indibloggers.blogspot.com/ . I hope you don’t mind me ‘spamming ‘your comment box!!! Here is a little piece of information regarding an exciting new concept – blogging awards. You can visit my page for the curtain raiser .we require participation & inputs from all spheres of the blog world. Your participation would help us in providing variety as well as quality to our blogging awards – THE BLOGERRATTI . please visit my page and lend in your valuable support . http://levelhead.rediffblogs.com/
ReplyDelete